Enhance your Goal Attainment Scaling Knowledge, from Setting Meaningful Goals to Measuring Success.
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is an individualized patient-centered outcome that quantifies the effects of an intervention based on personal goals. Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals work together to identify and set treatment goals that area meaningful to them.
Since its introduction in 1968 by Kiresuk and Sherman1, Goal attainment scaling (GAS) has been a reliable and highly responsive measure of meaningful changes. Over 160 clinical trials have recorded GAS as an outcome, and it has been shown to be responsive to interventions in several disciplines.2
The use of GAS aligns with the FDA's Patient-Focused Drug Development: Incorporating Clinical Outcome Assessments Into Endpoints for Regulatory Decision-Making Draft Guidance #4, which highlights GAS as one of several useful personalized endpoints that can be used to reflect what is important for each patient in clinical trials specifically for diseases with variable clinical manifestations and impact on multiple aspects of feeling and functioning.3
Goal Attainment Scaling focuses on what matters most to the subject and their care partners.
A trained clinician rater facilitates a structured interview with the subject and/or caregiver to identify meaningful, individualised goals that reflect the subject’s priorities, challenges, and desired outcomes.
The clinician and patient collaboratively define a personalised 5-point goal attainment scale for each goal, outlining clear criteria for levels of improvement or decline from baseline.
During follow-up visits, trained clinician raters support the subject in evaluating the degree of goal attainment for each goal using the predefined GAS scale, ensuring consistent and standardized measurement of patient progress over time.
The GAS interviewer (healthcare professional) and the patient (and/or caregiver) work together to identify goals that matter most for the subject before the intervention begins. Patients are asked to identify at least 3 goal areas that are important to them, and they would like to see improved by treatment.


Once goal areas are identified, the patient describes their current state (baseline set at the -1 level on the scale) for each. Then, the GAS interviewer and the patient work together to specify the goal level and identify what improvement would look like (set at 0 level on the scale). The other attainment levels for better and worse outcomes are also identified, and a 5-point scale is developed for each goal area.
The GAS interviewer uses their clinical expertise to facilitate the goal-setting interview and ensure goals are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic/Relevant to the intervention, Time-bound).
At each predetermined follow-up visit, goal attainment is assessed. Patients are asked to describe their current state in relation to each goal area. The 5-point scale is reviewed together, and the patient is asked to rate their level of attainment. The GAS interviewer will also record their impression of attainment for each goal, which need not be the same as the participant’s rating.
For each participant, a summary score reveals the extent to which goals have been attained. The goals can be ranked by difficulty and importance. The scoring formula corrects for differential weighting of goals and differing number of goals between patients.

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) differs from traditional outcome measures or assessment tools in its focus on individualized and patient-specific goals. Unlike standardized measures that use predefined criteria, GAS allows practitioners and patients to set personalized goals collaboratively. The scoring system in GAS allows for a more nuanced and tailored assessment of progress, taking into account each individual's unique circumstances and objectives.
GAS is versatile and can be applied across a range of conditions and diseases, including:
Concerns about implementing GAS may include:
Subjectivity: Some may worry about the subjective nature of goal setting and scoring. To address this, clear and specific criteria for goal achievement should be established during goal-setting sessions.
Time-Intensive: Developing individualized goals and scoring systems can be time-consuming. Training healthcare professionals in efficient goal-setting processes and providing resources can help overcome this concern.
Standardization: Critics may argue that the lack of standardization makes it challenging to compare results across different individuals or settings. However, the flexibility of GAS can be seen as a strength, allowing for tailored and context-specific assessments. Ardea Outcomes ensures standardized implementation of GAS through using goal inventories, extensive training for clinicians and raters, a specialized software for GAS data capture (GoalNav®), and cutting-edge methods to ensure rigorous goal quality..
Training Needs: Proper training is essential for healthcare professionals to use GAS effectively. Addressing this concern involves incorporating GAS training into professional development programs.